<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Poisoner&#8217;s Art</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepoisonreview.com/2010/02/20/the-poisoners-art/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepoisonreview.com/2010/02/20/the-poisoners-art/</link>
	<description>&#34;Poison is everything and no thing is without poison&#34; - Paracelsus</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 22:47:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Gleaves</title>
		<link>http://www.thepoisonreview.com/2010/02/20/the-poisoners-art/comment-page-1/#comment-597</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Gleaves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 13:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepoisonreview.com/?p=825#comment-597</guid>
		<description>Back again, just spotted (whilst looking for something else) that the Poisoning Act was in 1530 not 1531.

This year also saw, inter alia, the Aliens Act, the Bridges Act, the Butchers Act and the Egyptians Act!

See:
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:List_of_Acts_of_Parliament_of_the_English_Parliament#1531_.2823_Hen._VIII.29</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back again, just spotted (whilst looking for something else) that the Poisoning Act was in 1530 not 1531.</p>
<p>This year also saw, inter alia, the Aliens Act, the Bridges Act, the Butchers Act and the Egyptians Act!</p>
<p>See:<br />
<a href="http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:List_of_Acts_of_Parliament_of_the_English_Parliament#1531_.2823_Hen._VIII.29" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:List_of_Acts_of_Parliament_of_the_English_Parliament#1531_.2823_Hen._VIII.29</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Gleaves</title>
		<link>http://www.thepoisonreview.com/2010/02/20/the-poisoners-art/comment-page-1/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Gleaves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 12:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepoisonreview.com/?p=825#comment-326</guid>
		<description>Leon

I am keen to avoid my post being seen like that xkcd comic:
http://xkcd.com/386/ 

So I must explain that I am a bit of a Henry VII fan and when I saw the story I was interested to find another new fact about him. I quickly realised the date error when I clicked through.

HVII is so often overshadowed by HVIII and consequently he is not as widely known about. For example, he turned down Columbus&#039; brother Bartholomew&#039;s request to fund &#039;that&#039; expedition, long before funding Cabot.  He had to fight off rebellion and two pretenders, was the first British monarch to issue gold sovereigns, amongst many other things.  To top it off, Francis Bacon wrote his biography.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leon</p>
<p>I am keen to avoid my post being seen like that xkcd comic:<br />
<a href="http://xkcd.com/386/" rel="nofollow">http://xkcd.com/386/</a> </p>
<p>So I must explain that I am a bit of a Henry VII fan and when I saw the story I was interested to find another new fact about him. I quickly realised the date error when I clicked through.</p>
<p>HVII is so often overshadowed by HVIII and consequently he is not as widely known about. For example, he turned down Columbus&#8217; brother Bartholomew&#8217;s request to fund &#8216;that&#8217; expedition, long before funding Cabot.  He had to fight off rebellion and two pretenders, was the first British monarch to issue gold sovereigns, amongst many other things.  To top it off, Francis Bacon wrote his biography.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://www.thepoisonreview.com/2010/02/20/the-poisoners-art/comment-page-1/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepoisonreview.com/?p=825#comment-297</guid>
		<description>Robin: Thanks for pointing out that correction. It was indeed Henry VIII, who ruled from 1509- 1547.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robin: Thanks for pointing out that correction. It was indeed Henry VIII, who ruled from 1509- 1547.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Gleaves</title>
		<link>http://www.thepoisonreview.com/2010/02/20/the-poisoners-art/comment-page-1/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Gleaves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepoisonreview.com/?p=825#comment-296</guid>
		<description>Interesting stuff. There is a minor mistake in the SMH article taken from the Telegraph&#039;s article*  It wasn&#039;t Henry VII, he died in 1509, but his more famous son, Henry VIII.

* http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/7231018/Poison-An-alarming-revival-of-a-dying-art.html#postComment</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting stuff. There is a minor mistake in the SMH article taken from the Telegraph&#8217;s article*  It wasn&#8217;t Henry VII, he died in 1509, but his more famous son, Henry VIII.</p>
<p>* <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/7231018/Poison-An-alarming-revival-of-a-dying-art.html#postComment" rel="nofollow">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/7231018/Poison-An-alarming-revival-of-a-dying-art.html#postComment</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

