<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The straight dope about the urine toxicology screens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepoisonreview.com/2010/07/27/the-straight-dope-about-the-urine-toxicology-screen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepoisonreview.com/2010/07/27/the-straight-dope-about-the-urine-toxicology-screen/</link>
	<description>&#34;Poison is everything and no thing is without poison&#34; - Paracelsus</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 22:47:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://www.thepoisonreview.com/2010/07/27/the-straight-dope-about-the-urine-toxicology-screen/comment-page-1/#comment-5954</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 07:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepoisonreview.com/?p=1501#comment-5954</guid>
		<description>Toxcast:

I believe you are correct about diazepam.  The article form which the urine screen card to obtained (Amer Family Physician  March 1 2010;81:635) says that the urine screen for diazepam is positive for 30 days, but does not provide any reference to support the claim.

As for the European Journal of Emergency Medicine article, a bunch of people in our toxicology group ingested ungodly amounts of (legal) Inca coca tea, after which our urine tests lit up like Roman candles.  i believe that you also were an author/victim on that paper.  The Inca teas was good (I took mine with honey and lemon) but I really would have preferred darjeeling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Toxcast:</p>
<p>I believe you are correct about diazepam.  The article form which the urine screen card to obtained (Amer Family Physician  March 1 2010;81:635) says that the urine screen for diazepam is positive for 30 days, but does not provide any reference to support the claim.</p>
<p>As for the European Journal of Emergency Medicine article, a bunch of people in our toxicology group ingested ungodly amounts of (legal) Inca coca tea, after which our urine tests lit up like Roman candles.  i believe that you also were an author/victim on that paper.  The Inca teas was good (I took mine with honey and lemon) but I really would have preferred darjeeling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toxcast</title>
		<link>http://www.thepoisonreview.com/2010/07/27/the-straight-dope-about-the-urine-toxicology-screen/comment-page-1/#comment-5950</link>
		<dc:creator>Toxcast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 03:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepoisonreview.com/?p=1501#comment-5950</guid>
		<description>i saw the urine screen card on your site.  although it has some
helpful info on it, i think many details on it are misleading.
diazepam will not give a positive result for 30 days, and some of the other false
positives/negatives have not been confirmed in the published lit on
this topic.  AND, the excellent coca tea paper on which you (LG) are an author is not even mentioned as a common false positive for cocaine metabolites (Euro J EM 2006;13:340).  overall, i really think the card stinks and is misleading to the general practitioner and i would give it only a single skull/crossbones on a scale
from 1 to 5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i saw the urine screen card on your site.  although it has some<br />
helpful info on it, i think many details on it are misleading.<br />
diazepam will not give a positive result for 30 days, and some of the other false<br />
positives/negatives have not been confirmed in the published lit on<br />
this topic.  AND, the excellent coca tea paper on which you (LG) are an author is not even mentioned as a common false positive for cocaine metabolites (Euro J EM 2006;13:340).  overall, i really think the card stinks and is misleading to the general practitioner and i would give it only a single skull/crossbones on a scale<br />
from 1 to 5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

